--- en:cephportworx [2019/07/07 18:29]
admin [Performance]
+++ en:cephportworx [2019/07/07 23:35]
admin [Conclusion]
@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 Postgresql/pgbench tool was used to test performance of storages. Used service,pod,pvc/pv yamls are [[https://github.com/vyrodovalexey/pwcephtest|here]].\\
-All test were started on external server: 24 threads, 24 GB MEM.\\ Prometheus was installed on separate VM.
+All tests were started on external server: 24 threads, 24 GB MEM.\\ Prometheus was installed on separate VM.
-The following pgbench test were used:\\
+The following pgbench tests were used:\\
 Init db:\\
   time pgbench -h IP  -p PORT -U test -i -s 5000 test
@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 ==== Conclusion ====
-Ceph has following advantages - Open Source licences, widespread use, numerous information in Internet.\\ Working with Cephfs snapshots is not convenient.
+ Ceph has following advantages - Open Source licences, widespread use, numerous information in Internet. Working with Cephfs snapshots is not convenient.\\
-Portworx has better performance of RWO volumes. But Portworx RWX volumes performance is very poor and can't be used for load services and applications.\\
+ Portworx has better performance of RWO volumes. But Portworx RWX volumes performance is very poor and can't be used for load services and applications.\\
 Both system can be monitored by Prometheus.\\

en/cephportworx.txt · Last modified: 2019/07/07 23:35 by admin

Show page